U.S. Inconsistencies
Between ambiguous online casino bans and inconsistent policies regarding
internet betting, the U.S. has been on a collision course with other countries
for years. Unfortunately for the small island nation of Antigua and Barbuda, the
U.S. failed to really take the nation’s World Trade Organisation case seriously
until major U.S. trading partners took up the cause as well with recent
compensation claims. The major conflict began just last year with the Unlawful
Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) and has escalated to a massive
international case handled through the WTO – the largest the WTO has ever
handled.
As the rumors regarding more than $100 billion in compensation claims continue,
many in the U.S. are beginning to look at the inconsistent policies that are
causing most of the international concern. The UIGEA does not simply ban all
online casino gambling activities in the United States, but rather prohibits
transactions with offshore gambling companies. This then creates trade issues
because the U.S. is still allowing online casino gambling at the state level in
terms of fantasy sports and internet betting. Antigua specifically calls into
questions that legitimacy of the ban considering it only targets offshore
companies and thus violates a decade old international trade agreement.
The WTO dispute continues and a conference was recently held in Brussels to work
toward a conclusion. The former director of policy planning for the US trade
Representative, Naotaka Matsukata, was present and commented on the precarious
online casino gambling situation. “The US$3.4 billion claim by Antigua and the
much larger claim of over US$100 billion by the seven other economies seeking
compensation are some of the largest penalties in the history of the WTO. This
is by far the most significant WTO case ever and its implications for both the
US and the EU are enormous. Given the size of the US gaming market, both the
potential benefit for European industry and the corresponding potential damage
to US companies is unprecedented.”
The crux of the issue comes to the fact that the U.S. allows domestic online
casino betting companies but specifically and deliberately excludes offshore
internet gambling companies.
|