GATS Treaty Specifics
If the United States is able to alter commitments in the 1994 GATS Treaty
without any consequences from the other countries that are bound by the GATS
Treaty, the U.S. could create a precedence for the disregard of the World Trade
Organisation. As the political climate surrounding the online casinos industry
begins to stir, most analysts are predicting some serious compensation requests
from other nations that previously had access to the U.S. internet gambling
industry. The GATS Treaty as it currently reads states that the U.S. is
obligated to have open trade borders as far as the online casinos gambling
industry is concerned.
Last year the U.S. passed the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act – a
piece of legislation that effectively banned transactions between U.S. financial
institutions and offshore online casinos operators. The WTO ruled that the UIGEA
was in violation of the GATS Treaty, and rather than alter the UIGEA, the U.S.
announced that it would instead ratify its commitments stated in the treaty.
Well, needless to say, that just hasn’t gone over well with other nations that
honor their trade commitments stated in the Treaty and had a stake in the U.S.’s
online casinos industry prior to the ban.
Altering commitments in an international treaty is actually quite rare, and this
online casinos gambling ban and subsequent legal action has been the largest
case the WTO has ever previously faced. So, according analysts, "There is a real
possibility that the WTO arbitration body will find that unless the U.S.
provides commercially meaningful compensation to Costa Rica and Antigua, it
cannot withdraw its commitment on gambling, without risking trade sanctions from
the affected parties."
That means that though the U.S. has every intention of withdrawing online
casinos gambling commitments from GATS, the country may not be willing to pay
the price of the withdrawal in increased trade commitments for a handful of
nations affected by the U.S.’s stance on internet gambling.
|